Claim a $35 or $85 Voucher Wilson DeMarini White Steel Bat Class Action Settlement

Who is a Class Member

You are included in the Wilson DeMarini White Steel Bat class action settlement if you purchased one or more new 13/14 White Steels from Wilson or an authorized dealer of Wilson in the United States from December 23, 2011 through June 6, 2018.

If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other class action settlements you may be eligible for.


Estimated Award

  • Voucher for $35 or $85 depending on warranty claim

Class members who purchased a new 13/14 White Steel bat and completed a warranty claim with Wilson will receive a $85 Wilson Voucher.

Class members who initiated but did not complete the warranty process and provided Wilson with their contact information, proof of purchase and indicated the White Steel was the reason for their claim will also receive a $85 Wilson Voucher.

Class members who did not start or complete a warranty claim will receive a $35 Wilson Voucher as long as they can show proof of purchase.


Proof of Purchase

  • You will need to provide documentation you purchased a White Steel bat, such as a receipt, credit card statement, pictures, or prior contact with Wilson regarding the softball bat.

Claim Form

  • class action lawsuits

Wilson DeMarini White Steel Bat Settlement Notes

  • Hiroyuki Oda, et al. v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.
  • Case No. 8:15-cv-02131
  • Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

In December 2015, several named plaintiffs filed this class action lawsuit against Wilson Sporting Goods asserting claims that Wilson’s Demarini White Steel softball bats were more prone to crack and break during normal use than other generations of the same bat model.

Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the bats (known as the 13/14 White Steel bats) “fail prematurely due to common defects” that include the chemical composition of the steel, an improperly placed seam in the middle of the barrel, insufficient thickness of the wall, and Wilson’s lack of quality control. The lawsuit contends Wilson violated California and federal laws by failing to disclose the alleged defects with the softball bats and complying with its express warranty.

Wilson contends that the 13/14 White Steels were properly designed and manufactured, and that the vast majority of them did not fail prematurely, and denies all allegations. Complete details about the case and settlement are provided on the Wilson DeMarini White Steel Bat settlement website.

Class members who wish to object to or exclude themselves from the Wilson DeMarini White Steel Bat settlement must do so by August 20, 2018. Class members who wish to participate in the settlement must submit a claim form on or before August 20, 2018.


Important Dates

  • 8/20/18: Claim Form Deadline
  • 8/20/18: Objection or Exclusion Deadline
  • 10/19/18: Final Hearing at 2:30 pm PT* (class members do not need to attend this hearing in order to receive a slice of the settlement pie).

*Settlement Class Members who wish to speak at the hearing should check www.WhiteSteelSettlement.com to confirm that the date or time of the Hearing has not been changed.


Contact Information

  • Mail: Wilson-Demarini 2013/14 White Steel Bats Settlement, c/o KCC Class Action Services, P.O. Box 404000, Louisville, KY 40233-4000
  • Phone: 1-877-468-0441
  • Email: info@WhiteSteelSettlement.com

Class Counsel


Settlement Website

Remington Firearms Class Action Settlement

Who is a Class Member

The Remington Firearms class action settlement includes:

  • “Current owners of Remington Model 700, Seven, Sportsman 78, 673, 710, 715, 770, 600, 660, XP-100, 721, 722, and 725 firearms containing a Remington trigger mechanism that utilizes a trigger connector;
  • Current owners of Remington Model 700 and Model Seven rifles containing an X-Mark Pro trigger mechanism manufactured from May 1, 2006 to April 9, 2014 who did not participate in the voluntary X-Mark Pro product recall prior to April 14, 2015; and
  • Current and former owners of Remington Model 700 and Model Seven rifles who replaced their rifle’s original Walker trigger mechanism with an X-Mark Pro trigger mechanism.”

If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other class action settlements you may be eligible for.


Estimated Award

  • VARIES

There are three options available to Settlement Class Members:

  1. Have the trigger mechanism retrofitted with a new X-Mark Pro or other connectorless trigger mechanism at no cost
  2. Receive a voucher code for Remington products redeemable at Remington’s online store; and/or
  3. Be refunded the money you spent to replace your Model 700 or Seven’s original Walker trigger mechanism with an X-Mark Pro trigger mechanism.

Proof of Purchase

  • N/A

Claim Form

  • class action lawsuits

Remington Firearms Settlement Notes

  • Ian Pollard v. Remington Arms Company LLC
  • Case No. 4:13-cv-00086-ODS
  • Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division

Plaintiff Ian Pollard filed this class action lawsuit alleging that the trigger mechanisms in certain Remington firearms are defective. Specifically, Pollard claims that the trigger can accidentally discharge without being pulled and as such use of the firearms is “diminished”.

Additionally, the Remington Firearms class action lawsuit contends that from May 1, 2006 to April 9, 2014, the assembly process for theX-Mark Pro trigger mechanism was faulty and led to an excess amount of bonding agent, which caused Model 700 or Seven rifles to discharge without a trigger pull.

Remington has voluntarily recalled the affected rifles which has been ongoing for two years to address the issue but denies the allegations in this case and maintains that the value and utility of its firearms has not been diminished. Complete details about the case and settlement are provided on the Remington Firearms settlement website.


Important Dates

The Remington Firearms Class Action Settlement was granted final approval on March 14, 2017. However, an appeal has been filed against the settlement, meaning claims will not be paid until all appeals are exhausted. Claim forms must be submitted within 18 months of the Settlement effective date and Class members should check www.RemingtonFirearmsClassActionSettlement.com regularly to confirm deadlines and the effective date of the settlement.


Contact Information

  • Mail: Angeion Group, Attn: Remington Claims, Suite 660, 1801 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103
  • Phone: 1-800-876-5940

Class Counsel


Settlement Website

Claim $72.50 Voucher Power Pressure Cooker Class Action Settlement

Who is a Class Member

Class members in the Power Pressure Cooker Settlement are defined as all “purchasers in the United States who bought Pressure Cookers manufactured, supplied, marketed, sold and/or distributed by the Defendant between March 1, 2013 and January 19, 2018.”

The exact Power Pressure Cooker’s included in the settlement are:

Model Number on Back of Unit Name on Face Plate
PPC770 Power Pressure Cooker XL
PPC770-1 Power Pressure Cooker XL
PPC780 Power Pressure Cooker XL
PPC780P Power Pressure Cooker XL
PPC790 Power Pressure Cooker XL
PCXL/PRO8 Power Pressure Cooker XL Pro
PC-PRO8 Power Pressure Cooker XL Pro
YBD60-100 Power Cooker Express
PC-WAL1 Power Cooker
PC-TR16 Power Cooker
PCXL/PRO6 Power Pressure Cooker XL Pro
PCXL/PRO6 (Date Code 1442) Power Pressure Cooker XL
PPC771 Power Pressure Cooker XL
PPC772 Power Pressure Cooker XL
PPC772P Power Cooker Plus
PPC773 Power Pressure Cooker XL
PC-WAL2 Power Cooker
PC-WAL3 Power Cooker
PC-WAL4 Power Cooker

 

If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other class action settlements you might be eligible for.


Estimated Award

  • $72.50 Credit Voucher + Extended Warranty

Class members who submit a valid and timely claim form can receive:

  • Extension of the original warranty through the date ending one year after the settlement effective date; and
  • $72.50 credit redeemable towards one of the following products:
    • Power Cooker, a 10-qt. pressure cooker – Model No. PC-WAL4
    • Power Air Fryer XL, a 5.3-qt. air fryer – Model No. AF-530
    • Copper Chef XL Precision Induction Cooktop Set, consisting of induction cooktop, 11” deep dish casserole pan with glass lid, fry basket, steam rack, 10” round pan with glass lid, and recipe book

Proof of Purchase

  • Along with contact information, claimants will need to provide the following information for each Power Pressure Cooker purchased:
    • Estimated Date of Purchase
    • Model Number on Back of Pressure Cooker
    • Name of Pressure Cooker on Face Plate
    • Proof of purchase such as a receipt or invoice, or a picture of the manufacturer’s identification plate from the back of the product

Claim Form

  • class action lawsuits

Power Pressure Cooker Settlement Notes

  • Chapman, et al. v. Tristar Products, Inc. & Pinon et al. v. Tristar Products, Inc.
  • Case No. 1:16CV01114
  • Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio

In 2016, two nationwide class action lawsuits were brought against Tristar, alleging certain models of the company’s Power Pressure Cookers were defective because they could be opened while dangerous levels of pressure remained in the units, causing liquid to erupt and injure consumers. Specifically the plaintiffs claim that these defects include the following:

  • the Pressure Cooker may suddenly release steam while being opened
  • the Pressure Cooker lid may be able to be moved while under pressure, contrary to the Owner’s Manual representation
  • the pressure relief valve may inaccurately indicate that built-up pressure has escaped the Pressure Cooker
  • there is a faulty gasket that may allow the lid to open despite the presence of significant built-up pressure
  • the Pressure Cooker does not properly seal
  • the Pressure cooker can develop pressure when the lid is only partially, or is improperly closed, contrary to the Owner’s Manual representation

Tristar denies all claims and allegations but agreed to settle to avoid the uncertainty of continued litigation.

Complete details are provided in the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement and other related documents are available on the Power Pressure Cooker Settlement website.

Class members who wish to exclude themselves or object to the terms of the Power Pressure Cooker Settlement must do so by June 4, 2018. Class members who wish to submit a claim form must do so by July 4, 2018.


Important Dates

  • 7/4/18: Claim Form Deadline
  • 6/4/18: Objection or Exclusion Deadline
  • 7/12/18: Final Hearing at 9:00 am ET* (class members do not need to attend this hearing in order to receive a slice of the settlement pie).

*Settlement Class Members who wish to speak at the hearing should check www.PowerPressureCookerSettlement to confirm that the date or time of the Hearing has not been changed.


Contact Information

  • Power Pressure Cooker Settlement, c/o Heffler Claims Group, PO Box 58580 , Philadelphia, PA 19102-8580
  • Phone: 844-271-4784

Class Counsel


Settlement Website