Claim $20 or 30% of Property Damage Durapro Toilet Connector Class Action Settlement

Who is a Class Member

You are included in the Durapro Toilet Connector class action settlement if you “own or owned, or lease or leased, a residence or other structure in the United States containing an eligible DuraPro Toilet Connector with a plastic Coupling Nut. This also includes any person or entity that suffers or has suffered Property Damage caused by the failure of a plastic Coupling Nut on a DuraProToilet Connector.”

If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other class action settlements you may be eligible for.


Settlement Amount

  • $16,500,000.00

Estimated Award

  • Up to $20 Per Toilet Connector or Up to 30% of Property Damage

Replacement of DuraPro Toilet Connector: For eligible claims submitted within two years of final approval of the Settlement, Claimants can receive a cash payment of $4 for each DuraPro Toilet Connector (up to 5 Toilet Connectors per residence or other structure) that they replace. The maximum cash payment for replacement of Toilet Connectors is $20.

Payment of Property Damage Due to Failure: Claimants can recover up to 30% of documented costs of repairs for Property Damage caused by the failure of a plastic Coupling Nut on a DuraPro Toilet Connector, with a minimum recovery of $4.


Proof of Purchase

Replacement of DuraPro Toilet Connector: You will need to provide evidence that the residence or other structure contained a Toilet Connector, such as (i) the Toilet Connector itself; (ii) a photograph of the Toilet Connector; or (iii) other form of proof satisfactory to the Claims Administrator.

Payment of Property Damage Due to Failure: To support your Damage Claim, you must submit any photographs of the Toilet Connector and Coupling Nut; labels, packaging, and purchase receipts; and reports that describe the cause of the loss. You will also need to submit documentation including receipts, invoices, estimates for damages not covered by insurance, explanation of benefits letters, proof of payment for all expenses not covered by an insurance carrier, and the amount of any deductible you paid.


Claim Form

  • class action lawsuits

DuraPro Toilet Connector Settlement Notes

  • Jacqueline D. Ajose, et al. v. Interline Brands Inc.
  • Case No. 14-cv-01707
  • Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

In August 2015, six named plaintiffs filed this amended class action lawsuit against Interline Brands over allegations the company manufactured and sold defective DuraPro Toilet Connectors, which caused substantial water damage to consumers’ property. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Interline knew about the defective condition of their DuraPro Toilet Connectors’ plastic coupling nuts.

In plaintiff Jacquelyn D. Ajose’s case, after returning home, she discovered that Interline’s DuraPro brand Toilet Connector failed in a third floor bathroom causing water to run unabated throughout her home. As a result of the Toilet Connectors’ failure, Ajose suffered major out-of-pocket damages including, but not limited to, payment of her property insurance deductible. Similar experiences were echoed by other plaintiffs.

Interline denies the allegations but agreed to settle the case for $16.5 million. Complete details about the case and settlement are provided on the DuraPro Toilet Connector settlement website.

Class members who wish to object to or exclude themselves from the DuraPro Toilet Connector settlement must do so by August 20, 2018. The deadline to file a claim will be 2 years after the final approval order (10/19/2020). Class members who wish to file a claim for property damage can do so for four years after the final approval order (10/19/2022).


Important Dates

  • 8/20/18: Objection or Exclusion Deadline
  • 10/19/18: Final Hearing at 1:00 pm CT* (class members do not need to attend this hearing in order to receive a slice of the settlement pie).

*Settlement Class Members who wish to speak at the hearing should check www.DuraProToiletConnectorSettlement.com to confirm that the date or time of the Hearing has not been changed.


Contact Information

  • Mail: Ajose v. Interline Claims Administrator, c/o Epiq, P.O. Box 2876, Portland, OR 97208-2876
  • Phone: 1-855-349-6393
  • Email: info@DuraProToiletConnectorSettlement.com

Class Counsel


Settlement Website

Claim $10 Papa Murphy’s TCPA Class Action Settlement

Who is a Class Member

You are included in the Telenav Text Message TCPA class action settlement  if you reside in the United States and the territories and received one or more text message advertisements from or on behalf of Papa Murphy’s between October 16, 2013 and June 15, 2015.

If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other class action settlements you may be eligible for.


Settlement Amount

  • $22,600,000.00

Estimated Award

  • $10 Cash and $10 in Papa Murphy’s Vouchers

Each Class member who submits a valid and timely Claim Form will receive $10 in cash. Papa Murphy’s will also provide two $5 vouchers to all Settlement Class members. The vouchers will be sent automatically (no claim form is needed). These vouchers cannot be combined in a single transactions and are valid at the Papa Murphy’s website until 6 months after the date of issue.


Proof of Purchase

  • You will need to provide the phone number that you received the text message from Papa Murphy’s.

Claim Form

  • class action lawsuits

Papa Murphy’s TCPA Settlement Notes

  • Lennartson et al. v. Papa Murphy’s Holdings Inc. et al.
  • Case No. 3:15-cv-05307-RBL
  • Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington at Tacoma

In May 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against Papa Murphy’s alleging the take-and-bake pizza chain sent text message advertisements to consumers without their prior express consent – a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

The TCPA guards against annoying telemarketing calls and unwanted text messages, barring companies from sending text message advertisements without a consumer first opting into the service. Specifically, plaintiff John Lennartson sued Papa Murphy’s for using an autodialer to send him unwanted text messages to his cell phone. Lennartson says he never consented to receive these promotional texts from Papa Murphy’s. The unwanted text messages offered deals for pizza.

Papa Murphy’s denies the allegations and that it violated any law. Complete details about the case and settlement are provided on the Papa Murphy’s TCPA settlement website.

Class members who wish to object to or exclude themselves from the Papa Murphy’s TCPA settlement must do so by August 14, 2018. Class members who wish to participate in the settlement must submit a claim form on or before August 14, 2018.


Important Dates

  • 8/14/18: Claim Form Deadline
  • 8/14/18: Objection or Exclusion Deadline
  • 9/28/18: Final Hearing at 1:30 pm PT* (class members do not need to attend this hearing in order to receive a slice of the settlement pie).

*Settlement Class Members who wish to speak at the hearing should check www.PapaMurphysTCPASettlement.com to confirm that the date or time of the Hearing has not been changed.


Contact Information

  • Mail: Lennartson, et al. v. Papa Murphy’s Holdings Inc., et al., c/o CPT Group, 50 Corporate Park, Irvine, CA 92606
  • Phone: 1-888-563-1256
  • Email: PapaMurphysTCPASettlement@cptgroup.com

Class Counsel


Settlement Website

BMW Excessive Oil Consumption Class Action Settlement

Who is a Class Member

The BMW Excessive Oil Consumption Class Action Settlement includes “all persons or entities in the United States and Puerto Rico who currently own or lease, or previously owned or leased, certain U.S. specification model-year 2009-2014 BMW 5 series, 6 series, 7 series, X5, or X6 vehicles equipped with an N63 engine purchased or leased in the United States or Puerto Rico”, which include the following vehicles:

Model Year Designation

Production Range

Model Designation

2009 to 2012

3/2009 to 6/2012

7 Series Sedan (F01 & F02)

2010 to 2013

4/2010 to 6/2012

7 Series Active Hybrid (F04)

2010 to 2012

9/2009 to 6/2012

5 Series Gran Turismo (F07)

2010 to 2013

3/2010 to 7/2013

5 Series Sedan (F10)

2011 to 2012

3/2011 to 7/2012

6 Series Convertible (F12)

2011 to 2012

7/2011 to 7/2012

6 Series Coupe (F13)

2010 to 2013

3/2010 to 6/2013

X5 SAV (E70)

2009 to 2014

7/2008 to 6/2014

X6 SAV (E71)

2009 to 2012

9/2009 to 9/2011

X6 Active Hybrid SAV (E72)

 

If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other class action settlements you may be eligible for.


Estimated Award

  • VARIES

Class members may be eligible for reimbursement of various expenses related to BMW excessive engine oil consumption and premature battery failure:

  • Past Oil Services: Voucher for 1 free future Oil Service OR reimbursement for the cost of up to $75 for each Oil Service claimed.
  • Past Oil Services for up to 7 quarts of oil purchased between oil services: Reimbursement of the cost (up to $10 per quart) of up to 7 quarts of oil
  • Towing/Rental/Roadside Assistance Service: Reimbursement up to $50 for the cost of 1 towing/rental/roadside assistance incurred
  • Past Replacement of Battery Less than 3 years old: Reimbursement for the cost of 1 replacement of a 90 Ah or 105 Ah battery purchased prior to the mailing of the Class Notice

Complete details of what the settlement provides can be found in FAQ 6 and 7.


Proof of Purchase

  • For Claimants seeking compensation for additional expense (i.e. past oil services or battery replacement expenses), you will need to submit a copy of your invoice and receipt. The invoice must contain the VIN, mileage, date of service, service provided, and amount due. More information about proof of purchase can be found in FAQ 6.

Claim Form

  • class action lawsuits

BMW Excessive Oil Consumption Settlement Notes

  • Bang v. BMW of North America LLC and Bavarian Motor Works
  • Case No. 2:15-cv-06945-MCA-SCM
  • Pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey

In September 2015, eight named plaintiffs filed this class action lawsuit against BMW of North America and Bavarian Motor works over allegations that certain BMW models consume excessive amounts of engine oil.

Specifically, the plaintiffs claim BMW’s V8 turbocharged N63 engines consume excessive amounts of engine oil between regularly scheduled service visits. Owners also complain about drained batteries and the expense of replacing the batteries on a routine basis. In addition to the N63 excessive engine oil consumption issues, the plaintiffs claim BMW batteries drain at advanced rates and require replacement every 10,000 miles or one year.

The BMW excessive engine oil consumption lawsuit alleges BMW knew the vehicles had problems because in June 2013, the automaker issued technical service bulletin to dealers after consumer complaints about excessive oil consumption, but failed to remedy the issue.

BMW denies the allegations and stands behind and supports their products. Complete details about the case and settlement are provided on the BMW Excessive Oil Consumption settlement website.

Class members who wish to object to or exclude themselves from the BMW Excessive Oil Consumption settlement must do so by August 23, 2018. Class members who wish to participate in the settlement must submit a claim form on or before October 10, 2018.


Important Dates

  • 10/10/18: Claim Form Deadline
  • 8/23/18: Objection or Exclusion Deadline
  • 9/10/18: Final Hearing at 2:30 pm ET* (class members do not need to attend this hearing in order to receive a slice of the settlement pie).

*Settlement Class Members who wish to speak at the hearing should check www.BangClassSettlement.com to confirm that the date or time of the Hearing has not been changed.


Contact Information

  • Mail: Bang Settlement Administrator – 6013, P.O. Box 44, Minneapolis, MN 55440-0044
  • Phone: 1-877-832-4402
  • Email: info@BangClassSettlement.com

Class Counsel


Settlement Website

Claim Up To $101 JPMorgan Chase Unwanted Robocalls Class Action Settlement

Who is a Class Member

You are included in the JPMorgan Chase Unwanted Robocalls class action settlement “if JPMC or any affiliate or agent acting on its behalf, made one or more telephone calls to your cellular telephone through the use of an automatic telephone dialing system or a prerecorded or artificial voice between April 20, 2012, through March 16, 2018, regarding a mortgage or home equity line of credit account and, prior to being called, you orally requested not to be called.”

If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other class action settlements you may be eligible for.


Settlement Amount

  • $2,250,000.00

Estimated Award

  • $5 to $101, depending on the number of valid claims submitted

Your exact payment will depend on how many Settlement Class members submit valid Claim Forms.

“Class counsel estimates that the amount of the settlement award, which is dependent upon the number of claims, to be approximately $101, but may be within the range of $101 (if 5% of the Settlement Class Members submit a claim) to $5 (if every estimated Settlement Class Member submits a claim).”


Proof of Purchase

  • You will need to provide a W-9 form in addition to your Claim Form.

Claim Form

  • class action lawsuits

JPMorgan Chase Unwanted Robocalls Settlement Notes

  • Barrow et al., v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
  • Case No. 1:16-cv-03577
  • Pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

In March 2017, plaintiffs Tomeka Barrow and Anthony Diaz filed this class action lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase Bank over allegations the company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by placing unwanted robocalls to consumers’ cell phones.

Reportedly, these unwanted robocalls were made using an automatic telephone dialing system regarding a mortgage of home equity line of credit. Both plaintiffs contend that not only did the not provide prior express consent to receive these calls, they verbally revoke any consent that Chase may have had to place these calls on multiple occasions. Still, they continued to received these unwanted robocalls.

Under the TCPA, making and/or initiating telephone calls using an automatic telephone dialing system to any cell phone number is prohibited. Companies who violated the TCPA can face hefty fines, upwards of $1,500 per willful violation.

JPMorgan Chase denies the allegations and that it violated any law. Complete details about the case and settlement are provided on the JPMorgan Chase Unwanted Robocalls settlement website.

Class members who wish to object to or exclude themselves from the JPMorgan Chase Unwanted Robocalls Settlement must do so by August 13, 2018. Class members who wish to participate in the settlement must submit a claim form on or before August 13, 2018.


Important Dates

  • 8/13/18: Claim Form Deadline
  • 8/13/18: Objection or Exclusion Deadline
  • 11/1/18: Final Hearing at 2:30 pm ET* (class members do not need to attend this hearing in order to receive a slice of the settlement pie).

*Settlement Class Members who wish to speak at the hearing should check www.BarrowTCPASettlement.com to confirm that the date or time of the Hearing has not been changed.


Contact Information

  • Mail: Barrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Settlement Administrator – Kurtzman Carson Consultants, P.O. Box 404058, Louisville, KY 40233-4058
  • Phone: 1-855-201-2636

Class Counsel


Settlement Website